Social Innovation Assessment Rubric

Hi Sec 2 SST students,

We will be using two rubrics to assess your Social Innovation Project. Kindly refer to the following:

Evaluation Rubric 1

Criteria / Levels	Ownership	Reflective Thinking	Creative Thinking	Project Management	Understanding of Innovative Process
Level 4 Accomplished	The pupil is knowledgeable and enthusiastic about every aspect of his / her product.	The pupil is keenly aware of his / her own thinking and is always evaluating the effectiveness of his / her own actions.	The pupil always generates new ways of viewing a situation outside the boundaries of standard convention.	The pupil manages his / her time very well, meeting all of the target timelines that were set.	The pupil fully understands and applies innovative process.
Level 3 Competent	The pupil is knowledgeable and enthusiastic about most aspects of his / her product.	The pupil is aware of his / her own thinking and is   evaluating the effectiveness of his / her own actions most of the time.	The pupil generates new ways of viewing a situation outside the boundaries of standard convention most of the time.	The pupil manages his / her time well, meeting most of the target timelines that were set.	The pupil mostly understands and applies the innovative process.
Level 2 Developing	The pupil is knowledgeable and enthusiastic about some aspects of his / her product.	The pupil is aware of his / her own thinking and evaluates the effectiveness of his / her own actions some of the time.	The pupil generates new ways of viewing a situation outside the boundaries of standard convention some of the time.	The pupil does not manage his / her time well, meeting only some of the target timelines that were set.	The pupil partially understands and applies the innovative process.
Level 1 Needs Improvement	The pupil is knowledgeable and enthusiastic about few aspects of his / her product.	The pupil is not aware of his / her own thinking and does not evaluate the effectiveness of his / her own actions.	The pupil does not generate new ways of viewing a situation outside the boundaries of standard convention.	The pupil is unable to manage his / her time at all, missing all of the target timelines that were set.	The pupil does not understand and apply the innovative process.

Evaluation Rubrics 2

Criteria / Levels	Product Model Standard/Quality	Product Originality	Product Meets Needs	Product Design	Product Model Serves Purpose	Quality of Project Report
Level 4 Accomplished	The product is of excellent standard and quality.	The product reflects several elements originality.	The product meets all the needs of the target group.	The product design and /or construction is of excellent standards.	The detailed sketches /   scale models / prototypes serves the intended purpose fully.	All sections of the the project report are detailed, clear, comprehensive.
Level 3 Competent	The product is of good standard and quality.	The product reflects few   elements of originality.	The product meets most of   the needs of the target group.	The product design and /or construction is of good standards.	The detailed sketches /   scale models / prototypes serves the intended purpose mostly and is made with   very good quality.	Most sections of the the project report are detailed, clear, comprehensive.
Level 2 Developing	The product is of fair standard and quality.	The product reflects 1 element of originality.	The product meets some of   the needs of the target group.	The product design and /or construction is of fair standards.	The detailed sketches /   scale models / prototypes serves the intended purpose to some extend and is made with good quality.	Some sections of the the project report are detailed, clear, comprehensive.
Level 1 Needs Improvement	The product is of low standard and quality.	The product does not reflect any element of originality.	The product does not meet the needs of the target group.	The product design and /or construction is of low standards.	The detailed sketches /   scale models / prototypes does not serve the intended purpose fully and is made with fair quality.	The project report is not detailed, clear or comprehensive.